Washington state appeals court throws out local gun ordinance: ‘An important victory’

A state appeals court said no to local Democrat lawmakers in a major win for supporters of the Second Amendment last week.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, a Washington state appeals court struck down on Monday a local gun ordinance in Edmonds, Washington that heavily restricted firearms storage and possession.

The three-judge panel that issued the ruling cited a Washington law that blocks local governments from passing gun reform measures that “preempt” state-level legislation.

An “unambiguous” decision

The Monday ruling covered “an Edmonds ordinance making it a civil infraction to store unlocked any firearm and to allow access to such a firearm by children or others not permitted by law to possess it.”

In their decision, the justices ruled in favor of three individual gun owners in the city who “testified that they have an interest in keeping their firearms unsecured in the presence of unauthorized users, and they will have to deviate from their storage practices to avoid violating both provisions of the ordinance.”

The ruling was unanimous, according to the Free Beacon.

“[T]he legislature’s express preemption of ‘the entire field of firearms regulation’ is unambiguous and necessarily extends to regulations of the storage of firearms,” the justices wrote.

“An important victory”

Perhaps unsurprisingly, supporters of the Second Amendment are celebrating the decision.

“Today’s ruling is an important victory for the people of Washington,” Lars Dalseide, spokesman for NRA Washington state, said in a statement, according to the Free Beacon.

“Hopefully jurisdictions like Edmonds will realize that violating the Washington State Constitution is neither legal nor in the best interest of personal protection,” he added.

Dalseide went on:

Washington state law prevents local jurisdictions from passing laws that are inconsistent with or more restrictive than state law. We thank the courts for faithfully applying the preemption law and securing the rights of those who choose to protect themselves, their families, and their homes.

One can only hope the case out of Edmonds, Washington will serve as a precedent for similar cases across the country, as gun owners continue to fight for what is supposed to be a constitutionally-protected right.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

10 Responses

  1. That decision has reaffirmed my faith in judges applying our constitutional laws regarding the 2nd Amendment.

    1. the SCOTUS Cavanaugh, Barrett, Roberts, & Soto Mayor broke the law when not adhering to the Constitution about the Voter Fraud that occurred across the entire U.S. during the 2020 Elections.

      All four should be charge with a severe punishment such as impeachment or removal from their appointed positions.

  2. You Might Like
  3. Michael Saunders, U.S. Army S.F. veteran of the Vietnam war and 23 years in law enforcement says:

    The courts did the right thing for gun owners. The second amendment of our constitution gives the citizens of this country the right to keep and bear arms when it is necessary to protect their selves and their families and homes and property.

  4. Heavily restricted firearms storage and possession is a communist demo dream and we know why.

    They do not wanr their people shot/killed while attemping to enter our home and attacking our families.

    Kepp your gun handy, loaded and when they cattack shoot, one shot one dead communist. USMC

  5. I ѡanted to thank you for this excellent read!!
    I certainly enjoyed every little bit of it.

    I’ve got you bookmɑrked to look at new stuff you post…

Leave a Reply to appease Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts