Despite mainstream media attempts to bury the damning facts of first son Hunter Biden’s sordid life, the recent Breitbart News film My Son Hunter lays bare a series of facts about President Joe Biden’s family, including the true reason pseudonyms were often used when discussing business endeavors, as the outlet reports.
While the film itself makes use of an artistic license in depicting certain aspects of the first family’s corrupt entanglements, those behind the work are taking pains to outline which scenes from the movie shed light on true – and often shocking – parts of Hunter Biden’s life.
One of the “True Fact” revelations outlined by Breitbart is the notion that Hunter Biden regularly referred to his father with pseudonyms when involved in business-related discussions, and he did so to establish “plausible deniability” should Joe Biden’s potential knowledge of those dealings ever be the subject of criticism or scrutiny.
Many who have followed the story of the infamous laptop computer Hunter Biden abandoned in a Delaware repair shop will recall that one such nickname for the current commander in chief was “the big guy.”
Back in 2020, when liberal media outlets and tech giants were doing everything they could to squash the story of the laptop and all of the seedy and outrageous tales it told, former Biden business associate Tony Bobulinski emerged to provide confirmation that “the big guy” mentioned in an email exchange about a Chinese business deal was indeed Hunter Biden’s father.
At the time, Bobulinksi took aim at those – including then-candidate Joe Biden – suggesting that the email exchanges and other contents of the computer were nothing more than Russian disinformation designed to sway the outcome of the election, saying, “I have heard Joe Biden say he has never discussed his dealings with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden.”
Bobulinksi further declared that he was told by Joe Biden’s brother that the purpose of the nicknames and cagey language was to disguise the now-president’s involvement and facilitate the plausible deniability that might prove useful down the road, with another Biden associate telling him to never mention Joe by name in written documents because the family was “paranoid.”
Amid mounting evidence to the contrary, Biden and those around him have continued to reiterate their claims that the president was never aware of or involved in the many foreign business dealings that have raised suspicions in recent years.
Earlier this year, then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki went to lengths to again deny Joe Biden’s complicity in Hunter Biden-driven corruption, saying flatly, “The president does not get involved in the business dealings of this son.” That statement came on the heels of reporting from the New York Post indicating that Eric Schwerin, former business partner to Hunter Biden, met with Joe Biden during his tenure as former President Barack Obama’s vice president.
Since then, it has also emerged that during his time as VP, Joe Biden met with new fewer than 14 individuals with whom his son was involved in business negotiations or deals, including some from Mexico, China, Ukraine, Kasakhstan, and here in the United States. Further eroding the “plausible deniability” the Bidens sought to create was a Washington Examiner report earlier this year on a voicemail message Joe Biden left for Hunter Biden reassuring the latter that a New York Times story on his involvement with a controversial Chinese energy firm was unlikely to expose him to new legal or public relations concerns.
Despite massive amounts of evidence to the contrary when it comes to Biden’s claims of ignorance as to his son’s nefarious dealings, the president appears to expect that the American public will turn a blind eye to the glaring truth that is out in the open for all to see, and kudos to Breitbart for shining a spotlight on the galling lies the left believes the citizenry should unquestioningly swallow whole.