Federal judge sides with prosecutors on constitutionality of 1968 anti-riot law

Violence engulfed cities across the U.S. last summer as demonstrators took the streets to protest alleged police brutality and what they called systemic racism. In response to the unrest, then-President Donald Trump’s Justice Department moved to charge some of the accused rioters under a 1968 federal law known as the Civil Obedience Act.

While attorneys for one of the defendants have claimed that the Johnson-era anti-riot law is unconstitutional, a federal judge in Alabama has now made clear that he doesn’t agree.

According to Politico, U.S. District Court Judge Terry Moorer rejected arguments last week that the legislation is a racist relic that interferes with First Amendment activities.

Judge drops the hammer

Moorer, who Politico said was the first Black judge appointed to the federal judiciary by President Trump, remarked that while the law in question was largely forgotten about for decades, it is now being widely applied to those of all racial backgrounds.

“While [civil disorder law] prosecutions may not be common, it is clearly being applied now to a variety of persons — between the few cases that stemmed from the George Floyd protests that turned into civil disorder and more recently the cases asserted against some participants in the events on January 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol,” the judge said, according to Politico.

“Each of the…prosecutions that arose from those protests encompass individuals of a variety of races and genders with extremely different ideology,” Moorer added.

1A doesn’t protect criminal behavior

In his 24-page opinion, Moorer also dismissed assertions that the law was being used to impede constitutionally protected freedoms like speech and assembly.

“The First Amendment,” he pointed out, “does not give individuals the right to break a generally applicable law for expressive purposes.”

Moorer went on to stress that the law in question isn’t aimed at stopping “expression or association.” Instead, he said, it bans “the deliberate act of obstructing, impeding, or interfering with law enforcement performing their duties at a civil disorder.”

“Don’t look back”

Moorer’s ruling means that prosecutors can begin making their case against Tia Pugh, a 22-year-old who reportedly stands accused of breaking the windshield on a police car in Mobile, Alabama with a baseball bat.

Pugh’s lead attorney told Politico that the ruling was “disappointing, but not entirely unexpected,” and said the defense would push ahead. “Now, we turn to the trial and don’t look back,” the lawyer said.

If convicted, Pugh faces up to five years in federal prison, Politico reports.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

15 Responses

  1. I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone.

    Go to home media tech tab for more detail………..—->> http://www.newapp7.com

  2. If you were looking for a way to earn some extra income every week… Look no more!!!! Here is a great opportunity for everyone to make $95/per hour by working in your free time on your computer from home… I’ve been doing this for 6 months now and last month i’ve earned my first five-figure paycheck ever!!!! Learn more about it on following link…===))>>> http://snag4.com/

  3. You Might Like
  4. i am making a good salary from home 1200 to 2500 Dollars per week.which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,…. http://www.Cashapp3.com

  5. It’s amazing that now that Trump is out of office the courts are beginning to crack down on ANTIFA and BLM rioters.

    1. Those crack-downs are long overdue. These people are breaking the law in more ways than this one. “Peaceful” does not mean mugging people, looting retail establishments, and committing arson. And now interfering with the police who are doing their job to reduce violence . . . well, it’s about time these law-breakers were held to account.

    2. That is mainly because the democommunists wanted unrest, and division to further THEIR COMMUNIST agenda. They KNOW that a DIVIDED populace are easy to manipulate, CONTROL, then and take over. People need to open their eyes, and work together as WE THE PEOPLE have the POWER to drive the illegal aliens, their “gangs”, communists, and radical muslims OUT of our country. (and VOTE OUT the communists) that have been FRAUDULENTLY “elected” by “deep state” communist operatives that RIGGED the election to install their “chosen” chinese communist bought and owned, CONTROLLABLE, “PUPPETS”, dementia-joe and his constitutionally-ineligible “anchor baby HO”, to further destroy OUR constitutional republic.

  6. Freedom of speech and expression does not give the person the right to vandalize break, burn harm another person She should get more than 5 years

  7. I would like to know why so called journalists continue to call those who were burning down buildings, looting and harming/killing innocent people as demonstrators and protestors when they were/are clearly rioters? They should get what they deserve. No if, ands or what’s about it.

  8. If no police were in the car at the time, I think 5 years is a bit over the top. However, about 2 or 3 years plus restitution for the windshield is certainly warranted. Now, if police were in the car, then 5 years is not nearly enough time. Just to be clear I am conservative, but try to keep an open mind if logic can prevail.

  9. i just hope they dont say it was biden’s idea it was the democrates that was funding them to cause all the problems like harris getting people out of jail

  10. I get paid over $190 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.
    HERE ➤➤ http://snag4.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Posts