The Jan. 6 committee’s hearing on Thursday changed the focus of the Secret Service discussion with then-President Donald Trump after the evidence failed to support the left’s narrative.
The committee once emphasized Trump as attempting to take control of a Secret Service vehicle, a claim that has since been dismissed.
— Joel Pollak (@joelpollak) July 22, 2022
“The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service,” Breitbart News reported.
“Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been ‘irate.’ She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims,” it added.
The House committee investigating Jan. 6 announced that it has interviewed multiple witnesses who corroborated elements of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s explosive testimony on June 28 https://t.co/UeKUIjgsUP
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) July 22, 2022
“In a pre-recorded deposition, retired DC Metropolitan Police Sgt. Mark Robinson recalls hearing of a ‘heated discussion’ involving Trump and concerning the feasibility of him going to the Capitol,” the New York Post reported.
“The only description I received was that the president was upset and was adamant about going to the Capitol and there was a heated discussion about that,” recalled Robinson, who was in the lead motorcade vehicle with a Secret Service agent.
Robinson added that he could not recall a similar incident involving the commander-in-chief.
Jan. 6 hearings, Day 8 live updates: DC cop says Trump was in ‘heated discussion’ about going to the Capitol https://t.co/zX1QcExbSz via @nypost HOW can ANY one person SAY anything about what ANYONE said when there is NO rebuttal to the comment??? The Jan 6 committee is a FARCE!
— F. Monika Auger (@MsMamush2) July 22, 2022
The facts haven’t changed, but the committee’s presentation of them seems to be different.
The J6 committee continues to offer only one side of the story, creating a discussion by the left and for the left regarding the events of the day.