Justice Thomas stands firm as lone dissenter in SCOTUS ruling on free speech

A cussing teenager won a Supreme Court case on free expression Wednesday in which the rock-ribbed Clarence Thomas was the only dissenter.

According to the Washington Examinerthe nation’s highest court issued an 8–1 opinion finding that a Pennsylvania high school overstepped when it punished student Brandi Levy for cursing out her school on Snapchat, a popular social media platform.

SCOTUS sides with teen

Levy, who has since graduated, shared a profanity-laced post in 2017 after she did not make the varsity cheerleading team, declaring, “F*** school. F*** softball. F*** cheer. F*** everything.” The school banned Levy from cheerleading for a year.

The case turned on tricky questions of where campus begins and ends in the era of smartphones. The school invoked the ambiguity of that distinction in its defense and argued it was immaterial where the speech originated, so long as it caused disruption. The Biden administration sided with the school, NBC News reported.

Writing for the majority, Justice Stephen Breyer recognized that schools have some authority to regulate off-campus speech, but that it is generally “diminished” and that such regulation should be approached carefully so as not to give schools unbridled authority over “all the speech a student utters during the full 24-hour day.”

In this case, the school did not suffer “substantial disruption” and lacked in loco parentis authority, Breyer said, according to the Examiner. As Levy made the post on a Saturday, was off-campus, and was sharing the speech with a private circle of friends online, the circumstances weighed in her favor, the justice explained.

“There is little to suggest a substantial interference in, or disruption of, the school’s efforts to maintain cohesion on the school cheerleading squad,” Breyer wrote.

Justice Thomas dissents

In his lonely dissent, Thomas accused the majority of sloppy thinking that ignored historical precedent granting schools greater power to regulate off campus speech than Breyer recognized.

Thomas argued that historically, schools have authority where speech “has a proximate tendency to harm the school, its faculty or students, or its programs” and that Levy’s speech had the effect of undermining the authority of the coach in front of pupils.

He also slammed the majority for failing to more carefully consider whether her speech was actually off-campus, as well as relevant history that Thomas said suggests schools may have in loco parentis authority off-campus.

Since messages sent over social media can quickly spread, when it “is foreseeable and likely that speech will travel onto campus, a school has a stronger claim to treating the speech as on-campus speech,” Thomas charged.

In a concurring opinion, Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch warned that schools should tread carefully when regulating off-campus speech, the Examiner reported.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

9 Responses

  1. I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. https://Www.Work75.Com

    1. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

      Here is I started.…………… https://www.CashApp1.Com

    2. I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link…

      Try it, you won’t regret it!……….. https://www.paybuzz1.com

  2. I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…GOOD LUCK..
    HERE ➤➤ https://Www.Fulwork.Com

  3. You Might Like
  4. What is missing here is the parents. They had to be the funder of this fruitless endeavor. Rather than correct the offensive mis-guided rant they have condoned it as well as emboldening others. A sad example of character and values.

  5. The supreme court has gone political and is no longer an independent body.
    This girl got what she deserved for her foul mouth tirade. I guess todays parents don’t discipline their children. This is the age where everybody gets a trophy for participating instead of learning to cope with loss.

  6. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.…………… https://www.CashApp1.Com

  7. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.…………… https://Www.Jobcash1.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Posts