‘Nuclear war’: Senate Republicans vow to fight back against Democratic plans to pack Supreme Court

A number of Democratic lawmakers are pushing a plan to expand the U.S. Supreme Court to include 13 justices in a move many Republicans are describing as a blatant power grab.

For his part, Sen. John Thun (R-SD), if Democrats continue their push to add four justices to the nation’s highest court, it will trigger a “nuclear war” in the Senate, thus destroying all hopes of bipartisanship.

“Bare-knuckle brawl”

“I think if they try to do that, it’d be [a] no-holds-barred, bare-knuckle brawl,” he said in a recent interview with the Washington Examiner.

The process commonly known as court-packing would require an end to the Senate filibuster and Thune declared that the GOP would respond in kind to such a declaration of partisan war from across the aisle.

Among the likely actions Republicans could take in such a scenario would be refusing the Senate a quorum on future motions and adding numerous amendments to proposed bills, both of which would slow the chamber’s business down to a crawl. Nevertheless, several House Democrats continue to push for an expanded Supreme Court as a reaction to the perceived impropriety of GOP actions in recent years that have resulted in a conservative majority on the court.

Democrats widely objected to the decision of Senate Republicans to refuse a vote on former President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016 as well as the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett just weeks before November’s presidential election.

In response to those GOP moves, some Democrats believe that court-packing is justified. With a governing majority on Capitol Hill and a Democrat in the White House, party leaders clearly see the courts — particularly the Supreme Court — as the only impediment to pushing through their progressive agenda.

“Creating a puppet court”

As Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made clear, however, his party is prepared to fight back using whatever tools are at its disposal.

“If I have to stay in South Carolina to deny a quorum to do this crazy stuff, I will,” he said. “If a third-world emerging democracy did this, the State Department with all of us would be talking about a puppet government creating a puppet court.”

The Senate requires a majority, or 51 senators, to be present for most actions to progress. Vice President Kamala Harris, who serves as the Senate president and tie-breaking vote, does not count toward that number.

To deny Democrats a quorum, all 50 GOP senators would need to be on board. If Democrats decided to change the Senate rules to nullify the filibuster, however, they could also change the quorum rules just as easily.

At least a couple of Senate Democrats — Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona — are adamant about keeping the filibuster, though, and it would only take one dissenting vote from that party to kill the measure. In the end, the balance of American democracy appears to be hanging in the balance — and it could come down to two Democrats who care more about the country that party loyalty.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

6 Responses

  1. Packing the Supreme Court to get their way would be a disgrace ,but when did these modern day DEMOCRATS CARE one reason I left that party. There should be a law limiting the Justices to 9. This number works . They do not care about our country only to grab power for themselves.. NP,speaker of the house should be impeached. She is out to destroy the Constitution and our country. A person in all ways.dispicable

  2. There is not a conservative majority on the court. There is a constitutionalist majority on the court.
    There should never be left right balance in any court. The only bias allowed by a court is toward the constitution and the law. A display of bias toward other than the constitution and law is hard and fast grounds for impeachment and removal from the bench. A politician who might attempt balancing a court should be removed from office and banned from any position where he might effect balance.

  3. You Might Like
  4. Dems have a short memory. Good old Harry changed yjr rule for judges and look what happened. If they change the rules again when the republicans get control back they will make so many changes that the dems will be crying.

    1. That’s fine by me if the Republicans UNDO what the Democrats UNDID of Trumps, just as Biden undid. That will make ALL of the Dems UNdoing be nulled 🙂 & I’ll be happy. 🙂
      (this was SUPPOSED to be a REPLY to MikefromTexas)

  5. If the SCOTUS does not stand with the constitution then they are worthless to country they have turned their backs on America and her citizens,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts