Supreme Court rules against California in challenge to state’s donor disclosure rule

Among the last decisions of the current U.S. Supreme Court term was a ruling that represents a major loss for Vice President Kamala Harris.

In its majority opinion, the justices determined that California cannot force nonprofit organizations to disclose their major donors, Breitbart reported, providing a final verdict on a fierce political debate dating back to when Harris served as the state’s attorney general.

“Dramatic mismatch”

Two conservative groups — the Thomas More Law Center and Americans For Prosperity Foundation — have been challenging California’s disclosure requirement since it was implemented in 2010. The case resolved by the Supreme Court this week involves a challenge to the mandate that tax-exempt charities provide the state with their Schedule B tas forms listing top donors.

Plaintiffs in the case reportedly argued that the rule violates the First Amendment and makes donors vulnerable to harassment. The Americans For Prosperity Foundation also cited an incident in which 2,000 of its Schedule B forms were posted online by the state.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts determined that the requirement infringes on the freedom of association and is not “narrowly tailored” to California’s avowed interest in preventing fraud.

The state rule required thousands of organizations to disclose their donors upfront, though Schedule B forms are rarely used to investigate fraud. That struck Roberts as a “dramatic mismatch” between the government’s interests its methods of collecting information.

“Protected association furthers a wide variety of political, social, economic, educational, religious, and cultural ends and is especially important in preserving political and cultural diversity and in shielding dissident expression from suppression by the majority,” the chief justice said.

“The prime objective”

State officials also have other ways of obtaining Schedule B information, Roberts noted, concluding that “the State’s interest in amassing sensitive information for its own convenience is weak.”

While the state attorney general’s office “may well prefer to have every charity’s information close at hand, just in case,” the Supreme Court decision found that “the prime objective of the First Amendment is not efficiency.”

A district court sided with the conservative groups, but that ruling was subsequently reversed on appeal.

Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were in full agreement with Roberts while fellow conservatives Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas agreed in part.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the dissenting liberal justices, insisting that the plaintiffs failed to prove a First Amendment burden and that the ruling sets a bad precedent for transparency surrounding money in politics, according to Reuters.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

14 Responses

  1. My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour…. for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot .

    H̲E̲R̲E̲►COPY THIS WEBSITE……………… https://Www.Jobcash1.com

  2. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.……………………………….>> https://www.CashApp1.Com

  3. You Might Like
  4. my buddy’s friend makes $96 hourly on the internet. She has been with out artwork for five months however final month her charge emerge as $12747 really on foot on the internet for some hours. study greater on this net internet site….
    HERE☛ http://cash44.club/

  5. I am making a good salary from home $1300-$2600/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone, Here is what I do.——-> https://www.CashApp3.com

  6. My co-worker’s stepmother makes $95 hourly on the computer. She has been out of work for eight months but last month her check was $15,643 just working on the computer for a few hours. Go to this website.–→ http://www.Job62.com

  7. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.……………………………….>> https://www.CashApp1.Com

  8. Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..

    For more detail visit the given link…… http://www.Moneyapp2.com

  9. I looked at the paycheck of $4103 , I be certain that my friend woz like actually taking home money in their spare time at their laptop. . there friend had bean doing this 4 weeks less than and bought a great Bugatti Veyron……
    Open this web…… https://Www.Webcash1.Com

  10. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.……………………………….>> https://www.CashApp1.Com

  11. I see that this comment section has become a de facto spam section.

    Those “comments” therefore should be removed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Posts