Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging men-only military draft

The United States has a long history of drafting men into the military in times of need — and now, some are wondering whether the practice should apply to women, as well.

According to the Associated Press, the National Coalition For Men and two male plaintiffs have been hoping to take their case challenging the Military Service Act all the way to the highest court in the land. But in a bombshell move Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it had opted not to hear the case.

“Serious burden”

The plaintiffs in the case have been represented by attorney Ria Tabacco Mar, who insists that the law imposes an unconstitutional standard by exempting women from conscription.

According to the AP, Mar argued that the differing rules place a “serious burden on men that’s not being imposed on women.”

Still, Mar — who serves as director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project — contends that men are not the only ones being negatively impacted.

“It’s also sending a tremendously harmful message that women are less fit than men to serve their country in this particular way and conversely that men are less fit than women to stay home as caregivers in the event of an armed conflict,” she said of the law, as the AP reported.

“We think those stereotypes demean both men and women,” the lawyer continued, saying that the law sends a “really damaging message,” even though no one is currently being drafted.

Looking back

Of course, this is not the first time that America’s highest court has been asked to weigh in on the issue of the draft. According to The New York Times, the SCOTUS previously ruled in 1981 that an exclusively male draft is constitutional.

Writing for the majority in Rostker v. Goldberg, then-Justice William Rehnquist said “Congress acted well within its constitutional authority when it authorized the registration of men, and not women, under the Military Selective Service Act.”

As the Times reported, much of the reasoning for the justices’ decision in Goldberg revolved around the fact that female service members have historically been excluded from combat roles, but that policy changed in 2013.

What’s more, the AP notes that a congressional commission declared in 2020 that the “time is right” to compel women to register with the Selective Service System.

“The current disparate treatment of women unacceptably excludes women from a fundamental civic obligation and reinforces gender stereotypes about the role of women, undermining national security,” a report from the commission read, according to the AP.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

9 Responses

  1. I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

    Here is I started.…………… https://www.CashApp1.Com

    1. I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link…

      Try it, you won’t regret it!………………….

  2. my roomate’s mother-in-law makes $69 hourly on the computer. She has been unemployed for 7 months but last month her check was $21795 just working on the computer for a few hours. read review …..>>>>

  3. You Might Like
  4. Grace. I can see what your saying… Jamie`s bl0g is amazing… yesterday I picked up a great new Mazda from making $4040 this last 4 weeks and-over, 10 grand this past month. with-out any doubt it’s the nicest work I’ve had. I began this 7-months ago and straight away brought home at least $73.. p/h. navigate to this web-site …>>>>>>

  5. I don’t see a problem with women signing up for the armed services but how many who do so get pregnant in order to get out???

  6. Women in fire fights increase causalities. Like it or not Men tend to protect women just as gods plan

  7. Apparently the ACLU (the American communist Party) doesn’t know we have an all volunteer military right now and women like men can join or not join. So, I am wondering if their reason for the lawsuit is slowing our military down in a war. We also need women in war time to work in factories and reproduce the population. Islam even knows that. My Father went to War II knowing he had at least a boy and girl to remember him in case he died. My Mother worked in our near by city factories building airplanes like in seconds practically. Our grandparents watched us kids. Hitler was stunned when our military landed in Europe in speedy time he never expected. Why, because our men signed up fast, trained fast and went to war knowing their women and kids were safe at home and at the same time doing the behind the lines work the men needed. What the U.S. has had in all our wars is the best coordinated committed women and men a nation at war could have. I question why communist ACLU wants to wreck that. Remember we lost Vietnam thanks to the communist professors in our colleges having college kids out on the streets hating the U.S. and loving our communist enemies and the politicians caving into those communist kids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Latest Posts