Poll: Americans are against court-packing, for SCOTUS term limits

Congressional Democrats just received some bad news.

A new poll has found that Americans remain firmly against court-packing. 

Some numbers

This particular poll was conducted online by Ipsos on behalf of Reuters. On April 15th and 16th, 1,003 adults were asked to respond to various questions regarding the U.S. Supreme Court, including whether they support court-packing, that is, increasing the number of justices on the court.

The pollsters found that 42 percent of respondents were against the idea, that 38 percent were for it, and that 20 percent were unsure about it.

This poll took place at about the same time that some House Democrats introduced a bill to expand the Supreme Court from nine justices to thirteen. This would allow President Joe Biden to appoint four liberal justices, which would swing the court back in the favor of the liberals.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), however, probably well-aware of public opinion on the matter, has publicly declared that she will not put the bill before the House for a vote. Instead, she has deferred to Biden’s comission, which, among other things, is analysing the court-packing idea.

Many argue that court packing is a bad idea because it would end up turning the court into another Congress, since each time a different political party gains power they would simply expand the court adding more of their own justices. These days the sole argument of those for court-packing seems to be that it is necessary to counteract the court’s conservative majority.

Term limits

Pollsters also found that Americans seem to be in favor of term limits for Supreme Court justices.

63 percent of American indicated that they are in favor of such term limits, while 22 percent preferred to stick with lifetime appointments and 15 percent said they were unsure about the issue.

The argument for lifetime appointments is that it helps to keep the courts non-partisan, since the lifetime appointment means that a justice never has to worry about his or her popularity with the public.

Among some, this argument has been losing ground in recent years as the Supreme Court has clearly become more and more politicized. Now, those in favor of term limits argue that, since the court has become politicized, then we should start treating the justices more like politicians. Requiring them to retire so that they could be replaced by the president in power is a step in that direction.

The results of the Ipsos/Reuters poll are believe to be accurage within plus or minus four percentage points.

Share on facebook
Share To Facebook

Welcome to our comments section. We want to hear from you!

Any comments with profanity, advocacy of violence, harassment, personally identifiable information or other violations will be removed. If you feel your comment has been removed in error please contact us!

9 Responses

  1. You Might Like
  2. Hey! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog.

    Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I’m
    not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick.
    I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start.

    Do you have any points or suggestions? Many thanks

  3. I have come to the conclusion that democrats need to be run out of the country on a rail, right after being tarred and feathered!! They are the greediest, most power hungry, lying thieves I have ever seen! I KNOW there has to be at least one or two in Congress somewhere that has the balls, and the morals, to shut down every single idiotic thing this “president” is trying to foist on our country!

    1. What MORALS? They threw GOD out of their party and believe abortion is moral! How much more IMMORAL can you get?

  4. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch iis attractive, your authored submect matter stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get got an nervousness over that
    you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably
    come more formerly again since exactly the same nesrly a lot
    often inside case you shield this increase.
    webpage

  5. No packing the Supreme Court. It has been like this for I do believe 150 years. The democrats want to pack it to make sure no conservative will ever be nominated or approved by an all radical court. It will be the total end of the USA courts everywhere. The radicals are doing this for votes and power.

  6. Our fore fathers were against the life time appointments in judges, even scotus. They were getting away from the parliment. These judges can be asked to resign or petitioned. They are not guarenteed lifetime appointments. Where does that come from? P.S. I’ve read the Constitution and Bill of Rights many times just to see if I missed anything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts