White House retracts NSA deputy director nominee
In a surprising turn of events, the White House has backed away from its selection of Joe Francescon as the deputy director of the National Security Agency (NSA), raising eyebrows amid a troubling leadership vacuum.
This decision to withdraw Francescon’s nomination comes as the NSA and Cyber Command grapple with empty top positions, a situation that has persisted for eight months and shows no immediate resolution.
Francescon’s journey with the NSA began back in 2008, when he started building a career that later included stints at the White House National Security Council and the Pentagon.
Leadership Gaps Plague National Security
Fast forward to a more recent announcement from the NSA, when Director Tulsi Gabbard designated Francescon for the deputy director role, reportedly with President Trump’s approval, only for that plan to unravel now.
The White House’s reversal was first brought to light by The Record, with a White House official clarifying that since the deputy director position isn’t Senate-confirmed, no formal nomination was ever submitted.
Yet, the optics of this retreat aren’t pretty, especially as the acting deputy director prepares to retire by month’s end, leaving another hole in an already strained leadership structure.
Political Infighting Sparks Controversy
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) didn’t mince words on social platform X, announcing the administration’s decision to pull Francescon while pointing fingers at internal discord.
“This means the top two positions at NSA and the four-star commander at Cyber Command will remain vacant for 8 months and counting,” Bacon stated, highlighting a delay that’s hard to justify in an era of constant cyber threats.
Let’s be real—eight months without key leaders in place is more than a hiccup; it’s a glaring oversight when digital battlegrounds are hotter than ever, and Bacon’s frustration echoes a broader conservative concern about national security readiness.
Conservative Voices Weigh In
Bacon went further, blaming the fiasco on “infighting in the White House and the involvement of whacky Laura Loomer in hiring,” a jab that underscores how messy politics can derail critical appointments.
Speaking of Loomer, the conservative activist and Trump ally took to social media to cheer the withdrawal, slamming Francescon for a 2023 donation to Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), a Democrat tied to a video reminding military personnel they aren’t bound to follow unlawful orders.
While Loomer’s celebration might resonate with some on the right who question Francescon’s political leanings, it’s worth asking if a single donation should tank a career built on years of service—or if this is just another symptom of hyper-partisan score-settling.
Security Risks Amid Vacancies
The broader picture here is grim, as the NSA and Cyber Command—two pillars of America’s defense against digital warfare—remain leaderless at the highest levels, a vulnerability no one can afford.
Conservatives, especially those aligned with a strong national defense ethos, should be sounding the alarm, not just over who fills these roles, but how long it’s taking to prioritize stability over political squabbles.
In a world where cyber threats don’t pause for bureaucratic drama, the White House needs to move swiftly to fill these gaps, lest we risk being caught flat-footed by adversaries who exploit every weakness.





