Trump halts offshore wind farms citing security threats

By 
 December 23, 2025

President Donald Trump’s Interior Department just slammed the brakes on major offshore wind projects, and the reason might shock you.

The sudden halt, effective immediately, targets five key leases—Revolution Wind, Vineyard Wind 1, Sunrise Wind, CVOW, and Empire Wind—over grave national security concerns raised by defense officials.

For hardworking taxpayers footing the bill for both defense and energy, this pause could mean a financial reprieve from projects that might hike electricity costs—wind farms often demand backup natural gas plants for when the breeze dies down, doubling the burden on the grid. Let’s not ignore the potential legal exposure if these projects compromise our safety systems and leave us vulnerable. Conservatives demand answers, and no stone should be left unturned in investigating these risks.

National Security Risks Take Center Stage

Defense officials, backed by classified reports from the Department of War, have sounded the alarm about how these towering turbines mess with critical systems. They’re not just eyesores—they create a “blackout” for U.S. defense radar, experts warn.

This interference disrupts early warning systems, aviation safety, weather forecasting, and ocean surveillance. Imagine not being able to tell a friendly plane from a hostile one—talk about a gamble no American should accept.

Specific projects like Revolution Wind and Vineyard Wind are singled out for scrambling early warning systems meant to detect ballistic missiles, potentially slowing our response to deadly attacks.

Turbines Threaten Radar and Submarine Detection

Beyond radar, these turbines emit vibrations, electromagnetic fields, and acoustic signals that travel vast distances underwater. This noise could mask the sound of enemy submarines, making it harder to spot underwater threats.

As Diana Furchtgott-Roth sharply noted, “The point is that these wind turbines interfere with radar.” Well, isn’t that the understatement of the year? If our defense systems are blinded, we’re sitting ducks in a world that’s anything but safe.

Furchtgott-Roth didn’t stop there, warning of “serious threats to national defense because they scramble our radar.” That’s a gut punch to any notion that green energy trumps national safety. We can’t afford to prioritize trendy projects over protecting our homeland.

Energy Costs and Backup Systems Debated

Then there’s the economic angle—wind power critics argue it spikes electricity costs by forcing the grid to juggle two systems at once. A wind farm sounds nice until the wind stops, and then taxpayers are stuck paying for idle natural gas plants as backup.

Some energy experts push back, claiming the grid already has backup capacity and wind cuts fuel costs even with standby plants. Fair enough, but shouldn’t we focus on energy that doesn’t risk leaving us defenseless before debating the price tag?

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum framed it best: “The prime duty of the United States government is to protect the American people.” That’s not a slogan; it’s a mandate. If wind projects clash with that duty, they’ve got no business moving forward.

Balancing Progress with American Safety

The Interior Department’s decision isn’t a reckless shutdown—it’s a pause to work with leaseholders and state partners to assess and mitigate these dangers. A sneak attack enabled by compromised radar isn’t a risk worth taking for any amount of clean energy cred.

The Pentagon, notably silent so far, owes the public clarity on these classified findings. Americans deserve to know exactly how vulnerable these turbines could leave us. No dodging, no delays—just the hard truth.

Until then, this halt is a reminder that national security isn’t negotiable, no matter how much the progressive agenda pushes untested energy experiments. Let’s innovate, sure, but not at the cost of leaving our shores open to threats. Conservatives stand firm: protect America first, and the rest will follow.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson