Jon Stewart, the sharp-tongued host of Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, has dropped a verbal hammer on Bill and Hillary Clinton, insisting they comply with subpoenas tied to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

During an episode of The Weekly Show podcast on Tuesday, Stewart called for the Clintons to honor subpoenas from the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Epstein’s activities.

Reports indicate Bill Clinton failed to appear for a scheduled deposition that morning, earning contempt of Congress, while Hillary Clinton skipped her Wednesday deposition despite a bipartisan subpoena.

Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice has missed a deadline to release all Epstein files as mandated by a congressional vote, a point Stewart highlighted in his remarks.

The issue has ignited fierce debate over accountability and transparency in government. While Stewart’s comments lean toward compliance, they also raise questions about why some entities face stricter scrutiny than others. Let’s unpack this messy situation with a clear-eyed look at the facts and implications.

Stewart’s Bold Stance on Compliance

Stewart didn’t mince words, declaring the Clintons should “abso-fucking-lutely” comply with the subpoenas, Breitbart reported. That raw language cuts through the diplomatic fog often shrouding such controversies. It’s a refreshing, if blunt, demand for powerful figures to face the same expectations as everyday citizens.

But Stewart added a twist, questioning why the Clintons should step up if the Department of Justice itself drags its feet on releasing Epstein files. He mused, “But why should they comply if the Department of Justice is not complying with releasing the files?” That’s a fair jab at a system that often seems to play by two sets of rules.

The hypocrisy angle stings, especially for those frustrated by government stonewalling. If the DOJ can ignore congressional mandates, what moral authority does it have to subpoena anyone? This double standard fuels distrust in institutions already on shaky ground.

Clinton’s Resistance Raises Eyebrows

Bill Clinton’s no-show on Tuesday and Hillary’s absence on Wednesday only deepen public skepticism. Last month, reports detailed their resistance, including rejecting multiple chances to testify live in favor of written statements. Their attorney, David Kendall, claims Hillary has “no personal knowledge” of Epstein or his associates’ crimes.

Kendall further stated that Hillary never flew on Epstein’s plane or visited his island, while Bill hasn’t spoken to him in over two decades. That’s a tidy defense, but dodging a bipartisan subpoena doesn’t exactly scream transparency. Actions, not words, shape public perception here.

For many, this looks like elite privilege at work, sidestepping accountability while victims of Epstein’s crimes still seek justice. If there’s nothing to hide, why not face the committee and clear the air? The longer this drags on, the murkier it gets.

Victims Deserve Answers Now

Stewart also pointed out the absurdity of this saga’s duration, calling it “bonkers” how long it’s persisted. He’s not wrong—delays and deflections have plagued this case for far too long. Victims deserve resolution, not endless legal gamesmanship.

Beyond the Clintons, Stewart’s critique of the DOJ’s inaction hits a nerve. If the department can’t follow through on releasing files after a congressional vote, it undermines the entire process. This isn’t just bureaucratic sloth; it’s a betrayal of public trust.

Stewart’s call for universal compliance—both from the Clintons and the DOJ—resonates with those tired of selective enforcement. He emphasized that victims of this horrific case should finally get “some of the justice and peace that they deserve.” That’s a sentiment hard to argue against, no matter where you stand politically.

The Epstein case isn’t just about individual accountability; it’s a litmus test for whether our system can still function without favoritism. When high-profile figures skip subpoenas and agencies ignore deadlines, it erodes faith in equal justice. That’s a problem bigger than any one name.