DC prosecutor Jeannine Pirro warns of jail for armed entrants

By 
, February 4, 2026

Washington, DC, has become a focal point in debates over firearm regulations as a top prosecutor issued a warning to gun owners.

Jeannine Pirro, the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, stated on Fox News on Monday that anyone entering the District with a firearm will face jail time, regardless of licenses held elsewhere. She made these remarks while discussing a decline in DC homicides.

As reported by the Daily Mail, her statement has drawn criticism from pro-Second Amendment Republicans and gun rights advocates. The comments come amid ongoing tension between the Trump administration and supporters of gun rights.

Pirro’s Bold Statement Sparks Controversy

The issue has sparked intense debate, with many questioning whether Pirro’s hardline stance aligns with legal precedents and constitutional protections. Her words have not just raised eyebrows but lit a fire under those who hold the right to bear arms as sacrosanct.

Pirro didn’t mince words, stating, “You bring a gun into the District, you mark my words, you're going to jail.” She doubled down by dismissing out-of-state permits or law-abiding status elsewhere. This kind of rhetoric from a sitting US attorney feels like a direct challenge to the very principles many Americans cherish.

Representative Greg Steube of Florida, a US Army veteran, fired back on X, asserting his right to carry in DC with valid licenses from both Florida and the District. He boldly declared his intent to continue carrying for self-protection and the safety of others. It’s hard not to admire a lawmaker standing firm against what looks like overreach.

Legal Pushback from Conservative Lawmakers

Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky also weighed in on X, pointing out that DC has been a “shall issue” jurisdiction since a 2017 Supreme Court ruling struck down the “good reason” requirement for carrying a handgun. He noted that even non-residents can obtain permits in the District. This legal reality seems to undercut Pirro’s sweeping threat.

The National Association for Gun Rights, a powerful lobby group, called Pirro’s comments “unacceptable and intolerable” for someone in her position. When influential voices in the gun rights community speak out, it’s a signal that this issue won’t fade quietly.

Adding fuel to the fire, Pirro’s remarks come at a time when the Trump administration is already navigating tensions with Second Amendment supporters. White House officials, including the President, recently pointed fingers at Alex Pretti, who was tragically shot dead by Border Patrol agents during a protest in Minneapolis last month. Trump’s attempt to address the incident with reporters in Iowa last week has only deepened the rift.

Trump’s Comments Stir Further Tension

Trump told reporters, “I don't like that he had a gun, I don't like that he had two fully loaded magazines, that's a lot of bad stuff.” His words, meant to clarify, have instead frustrated many in the gun rights camp who see them as shifting blame rather than defending lawful carry.

A Second Amendment advocate, speaking to Politico, expressed deep concern over the political fallout, warning that gun owners are furious and may not turn out to vote if the messaging isn’t corrected soon. The advocate stressed the urgency, noting the impossibility of fixing this perception close to the midterms. This kind of voter apathy could spell trouble for Republican hopes.

Let’s be clear: carrying a concealed firearm in DC is legal with a District-issued permit, which even non-residents can obtain after passing strict background checks and completing mandatory training. The Metropolitan Police Department must issue these permits if requirements are met, though DC does not honor permits from other states. Without a permit, possessing a firearm in the District is a felony, carrying up to five years in jail.

What’s Next for Gun Rights in DC?

Pirro’s threat, while perhaps aimed at curbing crime, ignores the reality of lawful gun ownership and the protections enshrined in our Constitution. Her dismissal of licenses from other jurisdictions feels like a slap in the face to law-abiding citizens who play by the rules.

The backlash from figures like Steube and Massie shows that conservatives won’t let this slide without a fight. Their pushback, grounded in legal precedent and personal conviction, resonates with millions who see gun rights as non-negotiable.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration must tread carefully. With midterms looming and gun owners feeling alienated, every statement from the White House will be scrutinized. The President’s leadership here could either mend fences or widen the gap with a key voter base.

Ultimately, this clash in DC is more than a local spat—it’s a microcosm of the broader struggle over individual freedoms versus government control. Pirro’s words may have been meant to project strength, but they’ve instead exposed the fault lines in a debate that’s far from settled. Conservatives will be watching closely to see if principle prevails over posturing.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson