Two arrested in joint European operation over alleged sabotage of German warships at Hamburg shipyard

By 
, February 6, 2026

Two foreign contractors were arrested Tuesday in a sweeping joint European police operation for allegedly sabotaging multiple brand-new German warships while working inside one of the country's most storied military shipyards. A 37-year-old Romanian citizen and a 54-year-old Greek man — both employed at the Blohm und Voss shipyard in Hamburg — now face accusations that could carry profound national security implications for a NATO ally already struggling to rebuild its hollowed-out military.

The arrests, coordinated between German, Romanian, Greek, and EU police agencies through Eurojust, came after what prosecutors say was a string of sabotage acts carried out last year against "several" warships under construction or refit. Apartments belonging to both suspects were searched, and digital devices were recovered. Their names remain restricted under German privacy law.

It was only after the arrests that the German government confirmed it had concluded these were acts of sabotage — not accidents, not negligence, but deliberate attacks on the defense infrastructure of a sovereign European nation.

What They Allegedly Did

The Romanian suspect, employed as a painter at Blohm und Voss, allegedly poured 20 kilograms — roughly 45 pounds — of abrasive steel shot blasting media into the main engine of the corvette Emden, Breitbart News reported. That's not a subtle act. That is someone hauling a bag of industrial grit into a warship engine compartment and dumping it into the lubrication system. German prosecutors told Tagesschau that the attack could have:

"Led to significant damage to the ships or at least to their delayed departure, thereby endangering the security of the Federal Republic of Germany."

The sabotage was caught before the engines ran. Had it not been detected, the abrasive material grinding through the lubrication oil would have destroyed the engine from the inside out.

But the engine contamination wasn't the only alleged act. Prosecutors described a broader pattern of interference across the shipyard, including:

  • Punctured fresh water supply lines
  • Removed fuel tank caps
  • Deactivated safety switches in the ship's electronics

At least one other ship was also sabotaged, though exactly how remains unclear. These aren't pranks. Each of these acts, undetected at sea, could endanger a crew or render a warship operationally useless at the worst possible moment.

A Year-Long Security Failure

Here's the detail that should stop every defense official in Europe cold: according to Bild, at least one of the alleged saboteurs remained employed at the shipyard until this week — and had access to the secure facility for over a year after the attempted sabotage was first discovered.

Let that sink in.

Someone allegedly poured 45 pounds of metal grit into a warship engine, and the response from whichever authority oversees security at Blohm und Voss — a subsidiary of the German defense giant Rheinmetall — was to let the suspect keep swiping his badge for another twelve months. This is a shipyard that builds warships for the German Navy. It is not a commercial paint shop. The security protocols that allowed two foreign contractors to allegedly carry out serial acts of sabotage and then continue showing up to work demand far more scrutiny than they've received so far.

Germany has spent the last several years talking about its Zeitenwende — the great strategic turning point that would see it finally invest seriously in defense after decades of atrophy. Billions in new spending have been pledged. New procurement timelines have been set. And yet the country apparently cannot secure its own shipyards against two men with access badges and a grudge.

The Motive No One Will Name

Prosecutors have made no indication of whether they know the motive behind the alleged sabotage. That silence is conspicuous. The Greek suspect was arrested in the village of Koptero, in the Rhodope region of Greece, close to the Turkish border. Greek newspaper Protothema reported that the arrested man is a member of the country's "Muslim minority." No further context on motive has been offered by any official source.

Germany has simultaneously been dealing with an escalating campaign of hard-left activist sabotage targeting critical infrastructure. That context matters, even though prosecutors have drawn no direct connection between that campaign and this case. What's clear is that Germany faces threats to its defense industrial base from multiple vectors, and the security apparatus meant to guard against them has plainly failed.

The absence of a stated motive doesn't make the security breach less alarming — it makes it more so. If the authorities don't yet know why two men allegedly tried to cripple brand-new warships, that means they also don't know who else might be motivated to try the same thing tomorrow.

A Pattern Older Than NATO

Sabotage in wartime shipyards is not a new phenomenon. It is one of the oldest asymmetric tactics in naval warfare. During World War II, French dockworkers reportedly sabotaged the German submarine U-505 while it sat in occupied dockyards. A now-declassified 1944 OSS document laid out detailed methods for destroying engines through exactly this kind of contamination — abrasives in lubrication systems, foreign objects in gear mechanisms.

In 1948, the British aircraft carrier HMS Terrible was thought to have been sabotaged by someone throwing bolts into the main engine gearbox, with potential communists in the dockyards suspected. During the Cold War, MI5 kept lists of known communists to round up in the event of war — precisely because the threat of industrial sabotage inside defense facilities was considered existential.

Germany already had a warning shot. In 2024, a German minehunter ship was sabotaged at a separate shipyard in Rostock. The pattern was there. The precedent was there. And yet the vulnerability persisted.

What Europe Cannot Afford

Germany's military readiness is not an abstract policy question. It is the central pillar on which European NATO's conventional deterrence rests — or collapses. Every warship delayed, every engine destroyed, every safety system quietly deactivated chips away at the credibility of a defense posture that was already paper-thin. American taxpayers have been asked for decades to underwrite European security. The least Europe's largest economy can do is keep saboteurs out of the engine rooms.

The arrests are a necessary step. The joint European police operation that executed them demonstrates some level of interagency competence. But arrests after a year of continued access are damage control, not security. The investigation now needs to answer the questions prosecutors are conspicuously avoiding: Who directed these men? What was the motive? And how many other defense facilities across Europe are running on the same honor system that let two contractors walk into a warship and start dismantling it from the inside?

Several warships. Multiple acts of sabotage. A year of uninterrupted access after discovery. Two arrests.

Germany didn't just fail to protect its warships. It failed to act like a country that believes it needs them.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson