Letitia James calls Border Patrol account of migrant's death in Buffalo 'unreliable'
New York Attorney General Letitia James is challenging the Border Patrol's version of events surrounding the death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a migrant found dead on a Buffalo street in sub-freezing temperatures five days after agents dropped him off at a coffee shop at night.
The Washington Times reported that James sent a letter on Friday to Rep. Timothy Kennedy, the Democratic congressman who represents the Buffalo area, calling the agency's account "unreliable" and raising what she described as too many unanswered questions about Shah Alam's release and the hours that followed.
"There is no reason to credit that account on the basis of known facts."
Her office has opened a preliminary assessment into the circumstances. But the facts of this case, laid out in sequence, tell a story that raises questions far beyond what James seems interested in asking.
A timeline that demands scrutiny from every direction
Shah Alam came to the United States in December 2024 as a refugee from Burma. By February 2025, Buffalo police arrested and charged him with felony assault. He was also charged with female assault, burglary, and criminal mischief.
A local district attorney cut him a deal. Under the agreement, Shah Alam pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors: criminal trespass and criminal possession of a weapon. Police said he bit an officer during the arrest.
The longest misdemeanor sentence is a year, and Shah Alam had already served a little more than that time in the Erie County Jail since his arrest on Feb. 15, 2025.
The Department of Homeland Security had placed a deportation detainer on Shah Alam, asking to be alerted when he was to be released so agents could collect him. That detainer was still active on Feb. 19, the day he walked out of jail.
Customs and Border Protection said it picked him up from the jail but determined he wasn't deportable. Agents then gave Shah Alam what they described as a "courtesy ride" to a coffee shop, based on the migrant's request. They showed up at 4:30 p.m. and dropped him off at the coffee shop at 8:30. The coffee shop appeared to be closed.
Five days later, Shah Alam was dead on a Buffalo street.
The questions James isn't asking
James framed this as a failure of federal law enforcement. She raised concerns about communication difficulties, given that Shah Alam didn't speak English but rather a rare Rohingya dialect. Kennedy added that Shah Alam was mostly blind and couldn't read or write, nor use a phone. These are grim details, and the man's death is a genuine tragedy.
But notice what James isn't interrogating.
A man arrives in the country in December 2024. Within weeks, he's arrested for felony assault, female assault, burglary, and criminal mischief. A local DA pleads those charges down to misdemeanors. And then, upon release, he's determined to be "not deportable."
James wants to know why Border Patrol dropped a vulnerable man at a closed coffee shop on a freezing night. Fair enough. But she shows no curiosity about why a man with that rap sheet, accumulated that quickly after arrival, was plea-bargained down and released in the first place.
She has no apparent interest in why the system she oversees as the state's top law enforcement officer allowed a violent offender to walk out of county jail and into the cold with no plan, no resources, and no ability to communicate with anyone around him.
The AG's letter focused on what she called "transfer protocols." Her office is conducting an "Office of Special Investigation preliminary assessment" into the circumstances of Shah Alam's release on February 19.
"As part of our Office of Special Investigation preliminary assessment, we are seeking to determine the circumstances of his release on February 19."
Protocols are worth examining. But protocols didn't charge this man with a felony and then let a DA plead it down to misdemeanors. Protocols didn't create the conditions under which a recently arrived, non-English-speaking, mostly blind man with a violent criminal history was simply turned loose.
A familiar pattern
This is how the accountability game works in blue-state politics. A case involves multiple layers of failure across local, state, and federal systems. The state AG picks the one layer controlled by the federal government, in this case under a Republican administration, and directs all scrutiny there.
The local DA who offered the plea deal? Unnamed and unquestioned. The Erie County Jail's discharge procedures for a man who couldn't speak, read, write, see, or use a phone? Not the focus. The state-level infrastructure that should exist for individuals this vulnerable upon release? Not mentioned.
James has built a career on high-profile confrontations with federal authorities. The pattern is consistent: find a sympathetic case, isolate the federal component, and prosecute it in the press. The human being at the center becomes a vehicle for the political argument.
Activists this week also decried the death of Emmanuel Damas, who died in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Arizona Daily Star reported he died after struggling to get care from a worsening toothache. Guerline Jozef, executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, issued a statement:
"The death of Emmanuel Damas is a devastating reminder that our immigration detention system is failing the most basic standard of human dignity."
These cases are being bundled together by immigrant rights advocates to build a narrative about federal cruelty. But the details, when examined individually, point in different directions.
Shah Alam's case involves a state-level plea deal, a county jail release, and a federal courtesy ride. Damas's case involves conditions in ICE detention. Conflating them serves an agenda, not the facts.
Who failed Nurul Amin Shah Alam?
A man who couldn't see, couldn't speak the language, couldn't read, couldn't use a phone, and had been locked up for over a year was released from an Erie County jail into a Buffalo winter. Border Patrol agents drove him to a coffee shop because he asked. The coffee shop appeared to be closed. No one came for him. Five days later he was dead.
Every institution that touched this man's case failed him. The DA who bargained away the felony charges. The jail that released him without ensuring he had somewhere to go. The federal agents who dropped him at a dark coffee shop on a freezing night. The state that had no system in place for a person this vulnerable.
Letitia James wants answers from one of those institutions. Just one. The one she doesn't control, and the one controlled by the political party she opposes.
Shah Alam deserved better than what every level of government gave him. He also deserves better than being turned into a press release.

