Democrats refer Kristi Noem to DOJ for alleged perjury over $220 million DHS ad campaign

By 
, March 17, 2026

Top congressional Democrats have referred former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation, alleging she committed perjury by claiming Donald Trump personally approved a $220 million advertising campaign that featured her riding a horse at Mount Rushmore.

Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin and Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin sent the referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi, accusing Noem of "knowingly making false statements under oath" before the Senate Judiciary Committee. The referral landed after Noem testified earlier this month that Trump had known about and approved the lavish ad campaign.

Days later, Trump told reporters he had not approved the commercial. Within 24 hours of Noem's testimony, she became the first cabinet casualty of Trump's second term. Trump fired her just two days later.

The ad that sank a cabinet secretary

The $220 million contract awarded by DHS was allegedly given to a consulting firm linked to the husband of Noem's former spokesman, Tricia McLaughlin. The ad itself featured Noem galloping beside a stampeding herd of bison at Mount Rushmore in her home state of South Dakota, the Daily Mail reported.

It wasn't Democrats who first raised the alarm. Noem was grilled by her fellow Republicans during her Senate committee hearing. Senator John Kennedy, described as a hardline GOP senator, suggested during his questioning that Noem participated in the commercial to promote herself rather than the President's agenda.

"The President approved ahead of time you spending $220 million running TV ads across the country in which you are featured prominently?"

Noem claimed Trump personally approved the campaign. Kennedy wasn't buying it.

"It's just hard for me to believe, knowing the president as I do, that you said, 'Mr President, here's some ads I've cut, and I'm going to spend $220 million running them' that he would have agreed to that."

Kennedy told Noem the claim "puts the president in a terribly awkward spot." He added that he wasn't calling her a liar outright, but his skepticism filled the room like smoke.

MORE:  FCC Chairman Carr puts broadcasters on notice over Iran war coverage as Trump applauds

A referral built for cameras, not courtrooms

The Democrats' referral carries all the hallmarks of political theater dressed up as legal process. Raskin and Durbin seemed to acknowledge as much in their own letter to Bondi:

"We have low expectations that you will pursue this matter given your partisan weaponization of the Department of Justice."

Read that again. They filed a criminal referral while simultaneously declaring they don't expect it to go anywhere. This is not the behavior of people who believe they have a prosecutable case. This is a press release with a DOJ mailing address.

They did, however, note the legal runway available to them:

"We note that the statute of limitations for knowingly and willfully making false statements to Congress is five years."

Translation: even if nothing happens now, they intend to keep this card in their back pocket.

The DOJ's response was direct. A spokesperson told the Daily Mail:

"The DOJ has received the latest political stunt from the Democrats who should instead vote to reopen the Department of Homeland Security."

That reference lands with some weight. The vast majority of DHS remains shut down due to Democrats' refusal to approve funding. The same lawmakers demanding an investigation into a departing cabinet secretary can't be bothered to fund the department she was running.

MORE:  Obama Presidential Center wants 100 unpaid volunteers while its CEO collects $740,000 a year

Noem's real problem isn't Democrats

Here's what matters for conservatives: this story isn't really about Jamie Raskin or Dick Durbin. They are doing what Democrats always do, which is weaponizing congressional procedure for maximum media coverage. A source familiar with the matter told the Daily Mail the referral appears "pretty weak," though the questions surrounding the advertising contracts would be "the stickiest."

The real problem for Noem was never a Democratic referral. It was the $220 million itself.

Conservative voters sent this administration to Washington to secure the border, cut waste, and dismantle the bureaucratic bloat that has swallowed federal agencies whole. A quarter-billion-dollar ad campaign featuring a cabinet secretary on horseback is the kind of spending that makes DOGE necessary in the first place. That the contract allegedly went to a firm connected to the husband of Noem's own former spokesman only deepens the appearance of insider dealing.

Republicans on the committee saw the problem immediately. Kennedy didn't need a Democratic referral to recognize that something didn't add up. His questioning was pointed, specific, and devastating precisely because it came from a conservative senator who understood how this looked to the base.

What comes next

Noem and Corey Lewandowski, described as her rumored lover, are set to officially depart Homeland Security on March 31. She will be replaced by Markwayne Mullin, a conservative senator from Oklahoma.

MORE:  Missouri Judge Upholds GOP Redistricting Map, Handing Republicans Potential Seven-Seat Advantage

The criminal referral will almost certainly go nowhere. The DOJ under Bondi is not going to take marching orders from Raskin and Durbin, nor should it. But the political damage is already done, and it was self-inflicted long before Democrats got involved.

Noem arrived at DHS with a national profile and conservative credentials. She leaves with neither. Two hundred and twenty million dollars spent on an ad featuring yourself tends to have that effect.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson