Stephen Miller demands dismissal of '60 Minutes' staff over controversy
White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has thrown a grenade at CBS News, demanding the firing of '60 Minutes' producers over a pulled segment that’s got everyone talking.
The brouhaha centers on a yanked report by journalist Sharyn Alfonsi about Venezuelan men deported to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison, with claims of wrongful accusations and abuse, sparking a firestorm over editorial decisions at CBS.
For hardworking taxpayers, this mess raises serious questions about media accountability and the potential legal exposure if stories are suppressed for political reasons rather than factual ones.
Miller’s Fiery Call for Accountability
Miller didn’t hold back, accusing the '60 Minutes' team of staging a “revolt” against Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss, who pulled the segment deeming it unready for broadcast.
He argued the producers are out of touch, painting a picture of cozy elites pushing narratives that clash with the concerns of everyday Americans worried about crime and border security.
“You have these '60 Minutes' producers who are living in comfort and security, living in their West End condos trying to make us feel sympathetic for these monsters,” Miller said, hammering the disconnect he sees in media priorities.
Details of the Pulled Segment Emerge
The segment in question, crafted by Alfonsi, spotlighted Venezuelan men sent to CECOT, a high-security prison in El Salvador, who claimed they were falsely tied to the Tren de Aragua gang, recently labeled a foreign terrorist group.
Among the stories was that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident, whose lawyers argue he was unjustly deported and linked to gang activity without evidence.
Heart-wrenching accounts from the prisoners detailed physical and sexual abuse from day one behind bars, a narrative that’s tough to hear but critical to scrutinize.
Editorial Decisions Under Fire
Weiss defended her call to shelve the piece, stating it lacked context and key perspectives, though Alfonsi countered that it had been rigorously vetted five times by CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices.
Despite being yanked from U.S. airwaves, a 13-minute version of the report aired in Canada and spread online, ensuring the story didn’t vanish quietly.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill, from both sides of the aisle, have slammed the decision, questioning whether politics, not journalism, drove the move to pull the plug.
Political Backlash and Public Reaction
Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, didn’t mince words on social media, calling the ordeal a “terrible embarrassment” for CBS and warning executives against bowing to pressure over tough stories.
Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a Republican critical of certain party trends, went as far as canceling his Paramount+ subscription, branding the network’s actions akin to “state-owned media.”
Clearly, this isn’t just a newsroom spat—it’s a lightning rod for broader frustrations about trust in media, especially when stories touching on immigration and crime are at stake.






