Trump claims SCOTUS ruling lets Obama off the hook for Russia Collusion Hoax

By 
 July 27, 2025

President Donald Trump believes that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity essentially lets former President Barack Obama off the hook for any wrongdoing in relation to the infamous Russia-Trump collusion hoax. 

According to the New York Post, Trump suggested as much when speaking to the media on Friday.

Trump, however, also highlighted the fact that the ruling would not help Obama's accusers.

Obama's in the clear?

With regard to the Supreme Court ruling and whether or not it would help Obama, Trump told reporters on Friday, "It probably helps him a lot — the immunity ruling, but it doesn’t help the people around him at all. But it probably helps him a lot. "

The president added, "He’s done criminal acts, there’s no question about it, but he has immunity. He owes me big. Obama owes me big."

The Daily Mail reports:

Even if Obama were to be in trouble, the Supreme Court ruled in a monumental 2024 decision that the President of the United States has immunity from prosecution for official acts in office, in a case argued by lawyers on Trump's behalf.

Presumably, this would let Obama off the hook, even if the act he committed were some form of treason.

Trump had previously told Obama to "lawyer up," following recent revelations about his alleged involvement in the Russia-Trump collusion hoax. It is unclear whether or not he has, but some of his accomplices - such as James Clapper - are.

Background

Recently, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a large amount of documents revealing to the public how the Obama regime created the Trump-Russia collusion hoax to undermine Trump's first term in office.

Breitbart News reports:

In a briefing with reporters at the White House, Gabbard laid out the evidence that had been released on Friday and Monday from previously classified reports, showing that the outgoing Obama administration rejected intelligence assessments that said Russia had not interfered meaningfully in the 2016 election, and prepared a new assessment that reached the opposite conclusion, ostensibly to implicate President-elect Donald Trump and to undermine — and perhaps remove — his new administration.

Gabarrd has referred the situation to the U.S. Department of Justice, which will decide whether or not to proceed with any prosecutions.

Gabbard has made it clear that the evidence directly implicates Obama.

She said:

The evidence that we have found and that we have release directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson