Bunnie Xo says she and Jelly Roll still plan to have a baby despite divorce filing
Bunnie Xo went on her Dumb Blonde podcast last week and did something she had never done publicly: she laid out the full toll of her IVF journey with Jelly Roll, including four lost embryos, a year and a half of physical and emotional decline, and a marriage that buckled under the weight of it all. Then she dropped the line nobody expected.
"You guys are going to be shocked to hear this, but we're still having a baby," she told listeners. "We have been the most unconventional couple that you guys have ever encountered."
The 46-year-old podcaster and the 41-year-old country music star are divorcing. That much is settled. But if Bunnie Xo is to be believed, the divorce papers and the fertility treatments are running on parallel tracks, and neither one is stopping for the other. In an era when celebrity breakups generate a news cycle measured in hours, this one keeps defying the script.
Four embryos lost, three transfers, one grueling journey
The details Bunnie shared on the podcast were raw. She and Jelly Roll, whom she calls "Jay", underwent three embryo transfers. All failed. Four embryos were lost in total, including a set of twins they had hoped to carry.
Rolling Stone reported her description of the emotional toll in detail. Bunnie said the process left her hollowed out over the past eighteen months, unable to recognize herself.
"It was so hard on me that for the past year and a half, I became a shell of the person I was because I'm doing these IVF journeys. I'm fighting hard just to be able to produce enough eggs to make a baby with my husband, especially at my age."
She also disclosed that Jelly Roll dealt with a low sperm count and underwent hormone and medication treatment as part of the process. He has not independently confirmed those details.
Anyone who has watched a family member or friend go through IVF knows the cycle: hope, medication, waiting, loss, repeat. Bunnie described it in terms that cut through the celebrity gloss.
"My hat goes off to any woman, family, couple who is going through IVF because let me tell you something, dude. That is one of the loneliest, darkest journeys you will be on."
She added that the miscarriages were "gut-wrenching", a word that needs no embellishment.
A Mother's Day fight and a divorce filing
The split did not come from infidelity or some tabloid scandal. Fox News reported that a Mother's Day argument triggered the divorce filing. Jelly Roll filed papers on May 18. Bunnie said she had spoken out of anger when she told him to go ahead and file, and he did.
"Nobody cheated on the other person," she said on the podcast. "It's literally just we served our purpose for each other."
That framing, purpose served, no betrayal, still moving forward together on a child, is unusual enough to raise eyebrows. But the couple's entire history has been unusual. They married in 2016 at a Las Vegas chapel after Jelly Roll reportedly proposed during one of his shows in the city. Seven years later, around 2023, they returned to the same chapel to renew their vows.
Jelly Roll marked that renewal with an Instagram post that now reads like a time capsule from a different chapter. "My only regret on the night we got married was I never got to see her in a dress," he wrote. "We made that right. I may have never gave my wife the wedding she truly deserved but I plan on giving her the life she deserves for the rest of it."
He signed off: "You are my anchor."
The relationship behind the headlines
Whatever one thinks of the couple's public personas, the record Bunnie laid out on her podcast shows a relationship that carried real weight. She helped finance Jelly Roll's 2017 project Addiction Kills during a period when his career was still climbing. She helped him secure custody of his daughter from a previous relationship and get the girl into a condo near a good school.
Bunnie's own background is no secret. She worked in sex work and ran an OnlyFans account before shutting it down in 2022, a decision she tied to the success of her podcast. That history has made her a polarizing figure, but on the subject of IVF loss, the details she shared are the kind that transcend personal brand.
The divorce has already drawn reactions from Jelly Roll's family. His 18-year-old daughter spoke publicly about the split in terms that made clear the family fallout extends well beyond the two principals.
Celebrity marriages fracture under far less pressure than what Bunnie described. The IVF process alone, the hormones, the transfers, the losses, the grief that has no clean public outlet, would strain any couple. Layer on a career that puts one partner on the road and the other behind a podcast microphone, and the fault lines widen fast.
Still having a baby, but how?
The biggest unanswered question is the most obvious one: what does "still having a baby" actually mean? Bunnie did not specify whether they plan to continue IVF transfers, pursue surrogacy, consider adoption, or take some other path. At 46, the biological window for IVF narrows considerably, a reality she acknowledged on the podcast.
She also did not explain the legal mechanics. A divorced couple pursuing IVF together raises questions about custody, parental rights, and financial obligations that most family courts are not built to handle on autopilot. Whether those details have been worked out, or whether the announcement was more emotional than logistical, remains unclear.
The broader culture has seen a growing number of high-profile couples navigate public splits while children or custody remain in play. Sia's recent custody and child support battle after her own relationship breakdown is one example of how quickly the financial and legal dimensions can escalate once a split becomes official.
And the pattern of celebrity couples sending mixed signals about their status is hardly new. Jessica Biel's reported ultimatum to Justin Timberlake showed how marriages under public pressure often play out in stages, warning, crisis, public statement, before anyone knows the real ending.
What the IVF disclosure reveals
Strip away the celebrity layer and what Bunnie Xo described is a story that plays out in fertility clinics across the country every day. Couples in their late thirties and forties pour savings, health, and emotional reserves into a process with no guaranteed outcome. When it fails, the grief is private and largely invisible. When it fails repeatedly, it can hollow out a marriage from the inside.
Bunnie put numbers on it: four embryos, three transfers, a year and a half of decline. Those numbers represent real medical procedures, real hormonal disruption, and real loss. The fact that she chose to disclose them publicly, on a podcast, not in a carefully managed press release, suggests the weight of carrying the secret had become its own burden.
"I've never talked about this, but Jay and I have lost four embryos. We've had three transfers, but we lost the two twins that we were gonna try to have, and then we lost the other two. And anybody that's going through that and has to deal with these miscarriages, it's gut-wrenching."
She called Jelly Roll her "f***ing best friend" and said she still loves him. That language does not sound like a woman building a legal case or positioning for a settlement. It sounds like someone trying to explain a situation that does not fit neatly into any of the boxes the public wants to put it in.
The divorce filing date, May 18, and the podcast disclosure came weeks apart, suggesting this is not a coordinated media rollout but a couple processing a fracture in real time, in public, with a baby still theoretically on the way.
Whether that baby arrives, and under what arrangement, is a question only Bunnie Xo and Jelly Roll can answer. The public can watch, speculate, and comment. But the losses they described are not content. They are the kind of private grief that most people endure without a microphone, and that deserves a measure of respect regardless of what anyone thinks of the people involved.
Even the most prominent couples in public life eventually discover that the distance between what the cameras see and what happens behind closed doors is wider than any audience imagines.
Divorce papers are easy to file. Embryos are not easy to lose. The second fact matters more than the first, and no amount of podcast commentary will change that.

