DHS charges four foreign nationals in New Jersey for voting in federal elections
Federal prosecutors have charged four foreign nationals in New Jersey with voting illegally in U.S. elections spanning the last six years, cases that land as the White House claims more than a quarter-million non-citizens are registered to vote across four states.
The Department of Homeland Security announced the charges on Friday, naming an Israeli national, a Jamaican national, a Liberian national, and an Indian national who allegedly cast ballots in the 2020, 2022, and 2024 federal elections while ineligible to vote. Each faces charges ranging from voting by an alien in a federal election to making false statements during the naturalization process, Breitbart News reported.
The charges arrive weeks after New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill, a Democrat, admitted that a "software error" allowed thousands of foreign nationals to register to vote in her state, and that hundreds of them went on to cast ballots in elections since 2023.
Four cases, three election cycles, one state
The defendants span a wide range of ages, nationalities, and immigration histories, but they share a common thread: each allegedly voted in at least one federal election before becoming a U.S. citizen, or while still pursuing citizenship.
Idan Choresh, a 43-year-old Israeli national, arrived in the United States in January 2001. He received a green card in July 2020 and allegedly voted in the 2022 election. He applied for naturalized citizenship in May 2025. Federal prosecutors charged him with voting by an alien in a federal election, making false statements to naturalize, and unlawful procurement of citizenship or naturalization.
Jacenth Emelyn Beadle Exum, a 70-year-old Jamaican national, arrived in July 2000 and obtained a green card in July 2004. She allegedly voted in the 2020 election. Exum secured naturalized citizenship in August 2022 and now faces a charge of making false statements to naturalize, meaning prosecutors allege she concealed her prior illegal vote when she applied for citizenship.
David Gboty Neewilly, a 73-year-old Liberian national, came to the U.S. in July 1998 and received a green card in June 2014. He allegedly voted in both the 2020 and 2024 elections. Like Choresh, Neewilly applied for naturalized citizenship in May 2025. He faces charges of voting by an alien in a federal election and making false statements to naturalize.
The Justice Department has warned election officials in all 50 states that they face prosecution over noncitizen voting, and these New Jersey cases show that warning carries teeth.
Abhinandan Vig, a 33-year-old Indian national, arrived in June 2012 and allegedly voted in the 2020 election. No green card date was provided in the charging information, raising questions about what immigration status Vig held when he cast a ballot. He applied for naturalized citizenship in March 2024 and faces a charge of unlawful procurement of citizenship or naturalization.
Sherrill's 'software error' admission widens the scope
The four individual cases might look small on their own. They do not stand on their own. Governor Sherrill's admission this month that a software error opened the voter rolls to thousands of foreign nationals transforms four prosecutions into a signal of a much larger problem.
Sherrill said thousands of non-citizens wound up on New Jersey's voter rolls because of the glitch, and that hundreds of those registrants actually voted in elections from 2023 onward. She has not publicly identified the software, the vendor, or the agency responsible for the failure. No direct quote from the governor has been released in connection with the admission.
Whether the four defendants charged Friday are among the "hundreds" Sherrill referenced, or represent a separate set of cases uncovered by DHS investigators, remains unclear. Either way, the governor's own concession undercuts the longstanding progressive argument that noncitizen voting is too rare to matter.
DHS official Lauren Bis tied the New Jersey cases directly to Sherrill's admission and to a broader push for legislative reform:
"These aliens illegally voted in American elections. New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill confirmed thousands of non-citizens are registered to vote in New Jersey. We need the SAVE America Act to ensure only Americans elect American leaders."
The SAVE America Act, which Bis endorsed, would impose new requirements to verify citizenship before voter registration. Its current legislative status was not detailed in the DHS announcement.
White House documents put the figure at 250,000 across four states
The New Jersey charges did not emerge in isolation. The White House released documents this month claiming that more than 250,000 foreign nationals are illegally registered to vote across New Jersey, California, Pennsylvania, and Nevada combined. That figure, if accurate, dwarfs the margins that decided several competitive races in recent cycles.
The documents do not appear to break the 250,000 figure down by individual state, and no independent audit has confirmed the total. But the number aligns with the pattern Sherrill herself acknowledged in New Jersey: a system that let non-citizens onto the rolls and failed to catch them before they voted.
A similar case surfaced recently when an Australian lawful permanent resident was charged with illegally voting in two U.S. federal elections, another reminder that the problem crosses nationalities and state lines.
For years, critics of election integrity measures dismissed concerns about noncitizen voting as conspiracy thinking. The standard rebuttal held that the numbers were negligible and the penalties too severe for anyone to risk it. Four federal charging documents from a single state, backed by a Democratic governor's own admission, make that dismissal harder to sustain.
Gaps the charges leave open
Several questions remain unanswered. DHS did not specify which federal court or district filed the charges. No arrest information accompanied the announcement. It is unclear whether the four defendants are in custody, have been arraigned, or have retained counsel.
Nor did DHS say whether additional charges are forthcoming. If Sherrill's admission that hundreds of non-citizens voted is accurate, four prosecutions represent a fraction of the potential caseload. Whether DHS and federal prosecutors intend to pursue the rest, or whether the investigative resources exist to do so, is an open question.
DHS Secretary Mullin has already signaled that federal election funding could hinge on state security reforms, adding financial pressure to the enforcement push.
The "software error" explanation itself raises its own set of problems. Which system failed? Who built it? When was the error discovered, and how long did it persist before anyone acted? Sherrill has offered no public answers to those questions. A glitch that registers thousands of ineligible voters is not a minor bug, it is a breakdown in the most basic safeguard of self-government.
Meanwhile, declassified FBI documents have revealed that officials suppressed foreign election interference tips in the past, raising broader concerns about how seriously institutions have treated threats to ballot integrity.
Accountability starts with admitting the problem exists
The timeline in these cases is striking. Neewilly arrived in 1998. Exum arrived in 2000. Choresh arrived in 2001. For years or decades, each lived in the United States without full citizenship, and at some point, each ended up on a voter roll and cast a ballot. The system that was supposed to prevent that failed at every checkpoint.
Registration forms ask applicants to affirm citizenship. Election officials are supposed to verify eligibility. Naturalization applications ask whether the applicant has ever voted illegally. At each stage, the safeguard either did not work or was not enforced. And when a Democratic governor finally admitted the scale of the failure, she blamed a software error, not the policy choices that left the door open.
A federal judge recently quashed a DOJ subpoena seeking names of Fulton County election workers from the 2020 cycle, a reminder that election accountability battles are playing out in courtrooms across the country.
Four prosecutions will not fix a quarter-million bad registrations. But they establish a principle that has been missing for too long: casting a ballot you have no right to cast is a federal crime, and the government will treat it like one.
Every illegal vote cancels a lawful one. If the people in charge of elections cannot keep the rolls clean, voters have every right to demand that someone who can takes over the job.

