Hochul and Mamdani demand $87 million in counterterrorism funds from Trump — but FEMA says New York is sitting on $300 million unspent
New York's governor and mayor held a joint press conference demanding President Trump release $87 million in counterterrorism funding he promised eleven months ago, but federal officials fired back that the state is already sitting on more than $300 million in unspent homeland security grants.
Governor Kathy Hochul and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani stood together Tuesday at Hochul's Midtown Manhattan office, accusing the Trump administration of breaking a public commitment to restore federal counterterrorism funding slashed in September 2025. The Department of Homeland Security cut New York's grant allocation by $187 million that month. A federal judge later ordered DHS to revise the awards, and the state recovered roughly $100 million. Hochul says the remaining $87 million has never arrived, the New York Post reported.
The timing was deliberate. The 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks falls just ten days after the press conference. Hochul leaned hard on that calendar.
"Shame on you for withholding this money, not delivering it to me right now, 10 days before we honor those lives that were lost on 9/11."
She went further, framing the funding gap as a law enforcement issue.
"Let me translate that in real simple terms: Donald Trump is defunding the police."
That line will get headlines. Whether it holds up under scrutiny is another matter.
FEMA's response undercuts the crisis narrative
A FEMA spokesperson wasted no time pushing back. The agency's statement directly challenged Hochul's framing, asserting that New York has more than $300 million in federal homeland security funding already allocated, and unspent.
"Governor Hochul is manufacturing a funding crisis despite New York sitting on more than $300 million in UNSPENT federal homeland security funding."
That figure dwarfs the $87 million Hochul and Mamdani are demanding. If accurate, it raises a straightforward question: why is New York pressing for new money when it hasn't spent what it already has? Neither Hochul nor Mamdani addressed the FEMA claim directly at the press conference, and the Post's reporting does not indicate whether the $300 million figure includes or excludes the disputed $87 million.
The gap between the two sides is stark. Hochul says the state is short $87 million in critical counterterrorism resources. FEMA says the state is flush with more than three times that amount in untouched funds. Both claims carry the weight of official statements, and neither side, based on available reporting, has produced public documentation to settle the dispute.
Mamdani's record of political friction adds context
Mayor Mamdani joined Hochul's appeal with specifics about what the $87 million would fund. He cited twelve bomb squads across New York, FDNY internal communications systems needed during a catastrophic attack, and training and equipment for first responders facing a potential radiological threat.
"To put it simply, there is no excuse for the federal government to leave the nation's largest city to shoulder this burden alone."
Mamdani's willingness to confront the Trump administration is not new. The president has previously explored federal action to block Mamdani's pied-à-terre tax on luxury homes in New York, and the two have clashed repeatedly over city policy.
Terrence O'Leary, commissioner of the New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services, spoke alongside the governor and mayor. He described the scope of what the funding supports, cybersecurity operations, K-9 teams, bomb squads, and National Guard deployments, and pointed to major events held safely in New York over the summer as evidence the system works when properly resourced.
"Our first responders did the work and made sure that everyone could enjoy it. The federal portion of that was funding. Their funding is key for first responders here in New York state."
O'Leary also framed counterterrorism as a national obligation, not a local one.
"Terror is an international issue. It is something where the threat can originate anywhere. However, it is crystal clear that responders are here in New York."
Eleven months without a phone call
One of the more revealing details from the press conference had nothing to do with dollar figures. Hochul acknowledged she has not spoken directly with President Trump since the cuts were first announced eleven months ago. Instead, her administration has been "backchanneling" through the Department of Homeland Security.
That admission raises its own questions. If the governor considers this a genuine emergency, one she is willing to frame as "defunding the police" ten days before the 9/11 anniversary, why has she not picked up the phone or sought a meeting in nearly a year? Backchanneling through a federal bureaucracy is not the posture of an official treating a matter as urgent. It is the posture of an official who prefers the press conference to the negotiation.
Mamdani, meanwhile, has faced his own share of political turbulence. A federal judge blocked his pied-à-terre tax rollout earlier in his tenure, and the mayor has drawn scrutiny on multiple fronts, from questions about anti-Israel rhetoric to a fallen soldier's family barring him from speaking at a funeral. Standing next to Hochul and demanding federal money gives him a chance to cast himself as a defender of public safety rather than a politician mired in controversy.
Trump's October 2025 promise is the pivot point
The dispute traces back to a single Truth Social post. On October 3, 2025, weeks after the $187 million cut, Trump wrote that he had reversed the damage.
"I am pleased to advise that I reversed the cuts made to Homeland Security and Counterterrorism for New York City and State."
New York did recover roughly $100 million after a federal judge ordered DHS to revise its grant awards. But Hochul's office maintains that the remaining $87 million, the difference between the original $187 million cut and the $100 million restored, has never materialized. The mechanism by which that $87 million remains withheld is not clear from available reporting: whether it is a separate grant award, a held disbursement, or something else entirely.
Before the original cuts, New York's federal counterterrorism budget stood at $287 million. DHS slashed it to $30 million in September 2025. Even with the partial restoration, the state's allocation remains well below the pre-cut level if Hochul's accounting is correct.
The Trump administration did not immediately respond to the Post's inquiry about the press conference.
A political performance or a real shortfall?
Hochul delivered her sharpest line directly into the cameras, addressed to the president.
"Don't play political games with people's lives. Release the $87 million you owe us. Because if you don't release the counterterrorism funding, you're betraying every family that lost someone on 9/11."
The language is heavy. But FEMA's counterpunch, $300 million in unspent funds, is the kind of detail that can deflate a press conference in a hurry. If New York genuinely cannot account for how it has deployed the federal money it already holds, the governor's demand for more looks less like fiscal responsibility and more like political stagecraft timed to the 9/11 anniversary.
None of this means the $87 million question is illegitimate. A promise was made publicly. Eleven months later, the state says it has not been kept. That gap deserves a clear answer from the administration, not silence and not a redirect to unrelated grant balances.
But Hochul and Mamdani are not bystanders in this story. They are elected officials who chose a press conference over a phone call, who invoked 9/11 families as a rhetorical weapon, and who stood in front of cameras demanding money while their own federal spending record went unaddressed. Mamdani in particular has faced repeated questions about his administration's judgment on matters far less consequential than counterterrorism funding.
When politicians demand accountability from Washington, the first question is always whether they can survive the same standard applied to themselves. On the evidence so far, neither Hochul nor Mamdani has answered that one.

