Bill Clinton deposed in House Epstein probe, described as 'cooperative' by Rep. Luna

By 
, February 28, 2026

Former President Bill Clinton sat for a closed-door deposition on Friday as part of the House Oversight Committee's ongoing probe into the network surrounding deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who briefly stepped out of the session to address reporters, said Clinton had been cooperative throughout.

"As of right now, [he is] cooperative and answering all of our questions."

Newsmax reported that Luna declined to share specific details of Clinton's testimony but told reporters that the session was producing "a little bit more of a clearer picture" of the Epstein operation and its connections to powerful figures in politics, business, and academia.

The names that matter

Luna didn't limit her remarks to Clinton. She called out four Epstein associates by name: Lesley Groff, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, and Adriana Ross. All four, Luna alleged, participated in the trafficking of minors and received plea deals. She drew a hard line on their status.

"All of these women engaged in the trafficking of minors as adults. In my opinion, they are not to be given victim status because they did partake in harming young girls."

Luna said she would urge the Oversight Committee to bring those individuals in for questioning and review the circumstances under which they were granted plea agreements. Some of the victims, she noted, were as young as 10 or 11 years old.

That detail alone should reframe every conversation about who deserves leniency in this case. Plea deals exist to serve justice.

When the people who helped deliver children to a predator walk away with reduced consequences, the system has failed the only people who truly had no power in the room.

An intelligence operation?

Perhaps the most striking claim Luna offered was her suggestion that Epstein's operation bore "telltale signs of an intelligence gathering operation," potentially involving foreign interests targeting high-profile leaders. She did not elaborate further, but the implication is significant.

If Epstein's network functioned as a blackmail apparatus, the question of who knew what and when stops being a matter of tabloid curiosity. It becomes a national security concern.

The fact that Epstein cultivated deep ties across the highest levels of American power, and that he died in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, has fueled years of public suspicion that the full story has been deliberately buried.

Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping recruit and groom underage girls. She is, to date, the only figure in Epstein's orbit to face serious consequences.

Four associates allegedly involved in trafficking minors got plea deals. Epstein himself never saw trial. The American public has been told, repeatedly, that justice was served. It wasn't.

No sacred cows, no political games

Luna made a point of signaling that the investigation would not become a partisan weapon. She told reporters she would vote down any requests to bring in individuals who had made false allegations against Clinton, and would do the same for anyone making false claims against President Trump.

"If there is a request to bring in an individual who has made false allegations against President Clinton, I will be voting that down in committee — just as I will be voting down any individuals that have made false claims against President Trump."

That's the right posture. The Epstein case has always been bigger than any single political figure. For years, both parties treated it as a convenient grenade to lob at the other side while quietly hoping the full truth stayed sealed.

What the victims deserve is an investigation focused on the actual perpetrators and enablers, not on scoring cable news points.

Luna underscored that priority plainly:

"Our focus is bringing justice to the victims. There is no justice when traffickers are given plea deals."

What comes next

The deposition of a former president is not a small thing. Clinton's cooperation, whatever its limits, signals that the Oversight Committee is operating with genuine reach.

The real test is what follows. Will Groff, Kellen, Marcinkova, and Ross be compelled to testify? Will the plea agreements that shielded them face real scrutiny? Will the intelligence angle be pursued with the seriousness it demands?

Washington has a long history of launching investigations that generate headlines and deliver nothing. The Epstein case is littered with moments where the machinery of accountability ground to a halt at precisely the point where uncomfortable answers lived.

Girls as young as ten were fed into this operation. The adults who facilitated it owe the public a full accounting. Every last one of them.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson