Utah Valley University reportedly backs out of Charlie Kirk memorial one year after his assassination

By 
, August 10, 2026

Utah Valley University has allegedly withdrawn from a joint memorial with Turning Point USA planned for the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination on its campus, leaving the organization Kirk founded scrambling for a new venue.

The university sent an email to students and employees on August 7 announcing it would close operations on September 10, 2026, the anniversary of Kirk's fatal shooting. But instead of honoring the conservative activist who was gunned down on its grounds, UVU invited the campus community to a "Day of Caring" volunteer event organized with the United Way of Utah County. The Daily Caller News Foundation reported that an anonymous source cited by The Cougar Chronicle, a campus outlet, said UVU had pulled out of the joint memorial it had been planning with Turning Point USA.

Neither UVU nor Turning Point USA responded to requests for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation. Republican Utah state Sen. Dan McCay also did not respond.

Kirk, 31, was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while taking questions from students at UVU's campus in Orem, Utah. A Fox News report at the time described how 22-year-old Tyler Robinson was arrested after a 33-hour manhunt and formally charged. Authorities recovered a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a towel in a wooded area on the northeast end of campus.

One student who witnessed the shooting, Afton Miller, told Fox News she had been five to ten feet from Kirk when he was shot.

"No one should ever be able to say I've witnessed a school shooting, let alone the assassination of one of your greatest heroes."

UVU's email offered "reflection", but not Kirk's name in the headline

The university's August 7 email acknowledged the anniversary only in general terms. "Healing continues in different ways for each member of our university community as we approach September 10, the one-year anniversary of the tragic events surrounding Charlie Kirk's death," the email read. It continued: "To provide time and space for reflection, service, and connection, UVU will close operations" that day.

The Day of Caring event, run by United Way of Utah County, describes itself as a "corporate day of service" meant to "transform our classrooms, neighborhood parks, community gardens, and gathering places across our community." A campus closure and a volunteer cleanup are not the same thing as a memorial for a man who lost his life on university property. The email made no mention of the joint memorial that Turning Point USA had reportedly been planning with the school.

MORE:  Democratic donors and strategists rally behind Ocasio-Cortez for 2028 presidential bid

Turning Point USA, the organization Kirk founded, is now reportedly searching for a new location on short notice and is frustrated with the university's reported sudden withdrawal. The group has experience organizing large-scale tributes: it previously announced a major memorial service for Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, a venue that seats 63,400, according to Breitbart.

A pattern of evasion stretches back to September 2025

If UVU's handling of the anniversary feels familiar, it should. The university's first public response to Kirk's assassination set the template. UVU hosted a vigil on September 19, 2025, nine days after the shooting. Police and metal detectors secured the event. But The Cougar Chronicle reported that speakers mentioned Kirk by name only once during the entire vigil. Instead, they referred to what happened as "the tragedy on campus," as though the man at the center of it were incidental.

The accused assassin allegedly confessed in text messages and described his motive, according to court testimony from a federal agent. The case has drawn national attention not just for the act itself but for the circumstances surrounding it.

Weeks before Kirk's assassination, left-wing student activists at UVU had circulated a Change.org petition with over 940 signatures trying to block him from speaking on campus. The Washington Examiner reported that comments on the petition included hostile rhetoric comparing Kirk to Nazis and KKK members. One anonymous commenter wrote: "No tolerance for Nazi f***s like Kirk. Stop the speaking or someone else will."

UVU, to its credit, had refused to cancel Kirk's appearance. The university issued a statement on September 3, 2025, affirming its commitment to free speech and First Amendment rights. But the petition organizer, Gabriel Zavala, had framed the effort in terms that treated Kirk's presence as a form of harm: "Neutrality in the face of harm contradicts the values of care, accountability, and results."

MORE:  Trump bans MSNBC, CNN, and Politico from White House, citing 'fiction and lies'

Kirk spoke anyway. He was murdered for it.

Commencement speaker controversy added fuel

The university's handling of the anniversary did not emerge in a vacuum. In March 2026, UVU announced Sharon McMahon, an American author and podcaster, as its 2026 commencement speaker. Days after Kirk's assassination, McMahon had posted an Instagram image captioned "Charlie Kirk, In His Own Words." The image included text stating: "To many Americans, especially if you are black, LGBTQ, or Muslim, Charlie Kirk was not a person who simply engaged in good faith debates on college campuses." The post has since been deleted.

After the post drew backlash, UVU removed McMahon as commencement speaker, citing security concerns. Her spokesperson told The Salt Lake Tribune that McMahon "unequivocally condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk, repeatedly and publicly calling his death a tragedy and stressing that public debate must never be met with violence." The spokesperson added that McMahon's "goal is to unpack what is happening in society and help people understand how government works."

Whatever McMahon's intent, the episode underscored a pattern: the university appeared more comfortable managing controversy around Kirk's death than squarely honoring the man who died on its campus. The decision to invite McMahon in the first place, and the subsequent reversal, suggested an institution unsure of how to handle the political weight of what happened within its walls.

Meanwhile, Utah taxpayers face a reported $10 million defense tab for Kirk's accused killer, even as the suspect's father reportedly runs a thriving business, another dimension of the case that has drawn public frustration.

Vice President Vance canceled 9/11 plans to visit Kirk's family

The political world treated Kirk's death with the gravity UVU seems reluctant to match. Vice President JD Vance canceled his scheduled 9/11 memorial appearance in New York City to travel to Utah with Second Lady Usha Vance and pay respects to Kirk's family. Just The News reported that Vance described Kirk as "a true friend."

"Charlie Kirk was a true friend. The kind of guy you could say something to and know it would always stay with him... These group chats include people at the very highest level of our government. They trusted him, loved him, and knew he'd always have their backs."

MORE:  South Dakota's Republican secretary of state endorses Democrat to replace her after convention loss

That a sitting vice president rearranged his September 11 schedule to honor Kirk speaks to the weight of the loss. That the university where Kirk was killed cannot bring itself to co-host a memorial speaks to something else entirely.

Another UVU student, Ryder Warner, who was on campus when Kirk was shot, put the matter simply: "I don't think anybody should be killed over their opinion." National Review's Charles C. W. Cooke put a finer point on it: "An account of Charlie Kirk's murder that ignores the victim, the perpetrator, and the motive is no account at all."

Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk, has continued to navigate public life in the year since her husband's death. The family now faces the additional indignity of watching the institution where he was murdered treat his memory as a scheduling inconvenience.

Open questions remain as September 10 approaches

Key details about UVU's decision remain unclear. The university has not publicly explained why it withdrew from the joint memorial, if indeed it did. The anonymous source cited by The Cougar Chronicle has not been identified, and the nature of whatever agreement existed between UVU and Turning Point USA, formal contract or informal understanding, is unknown. UVU did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation's request for comment.

Turning Point USA has not said whether it has secured a replacement venue. With barely a month before the anniversary, the logistics are tight. Whether the organization can mount a fitting tribute on or near the campus where its founder was killed, without the university's cooperation, remains to be seen.

A university that cannot bring itself to honor a man murdered on its own campus has told you everything you need to know, not about Charlie Kirk, but about the institution.

" A free people [claim] their rights, as derived from the laws of nature."
Thomas Jefferson