German court sentences Afghan migrant to life in prison for Munich car-ramming that killed mother and child
A German court handed a life sentence to an Afghan migrant who drove a car into a crowd of demonstrators in Munich in February 2025, killing a mother and her two-year-old daughter, an attack the court found was religiously motivated.
The Higher Regional Court of Munich convicted 25-year-old Farhad N. on two counts of murder, 23 counts of attempted murder, 19 counts of aggravated assault, and three counts of assault for the February 13, 2025, attack on a labor union demonstration in Munich's city center. Judge Michael Höhne found "special severity of guilt," a designation under German law that means Farhad N. will not be eligible for the early release that most life-sentence inmates can seek after 15 years.
The attack killed a 37-year-old mother and her two-year-old daughter and left 44 others injured, some with life-threatening wounds. Farhad N. drove a BMW Mini through a police truck escort protecting the march, squeezing past with roughly two inches to spare, then plowed into the crowd. The initial impact sent the mother and child more than 30 feet.
Judge: online radicalization drove Farhad N. to view the attack as a "godly act"
Farhad N. refused to engage with the trial and never offered a motive. But the court and prosecution pieced together a picture from his online activity and behavior at the scene. The prosecutor told the court plainly that the act was aimed at killing as many people as possible.
As Breitbart reported, Judge Höhne said in his sentencing remarks:
"Under the influence of conservative and anti-Western clerics online, he developed exaggerated religious ideas... [he] blamed the USA and other Western states for the suffering of Muslims."
The court concluded that Farhad N. believed attacking Germans was the will of Allah, a "godly act" justified by Western involvement in Afghanistan and Gaza. When police arrested him at the scene, he called out "Allahu Akbar," held a Quran, and raised his index finger in an Islamist salute.
The prosecutor stated it bluntly: "the act was, and this must be stated clearly, aimed at the destruction of human life."
German news agency dpa reported that the court found Farhad N. "wanted to attack and kill arbitrarily chosen people in Germany as a reaction to the situation in Islamic countries and prove himself to be a 'good Muslim.'"
Asylum denied, deportation ordered, then paused
Farhad N. arrived in Germany in 2016 as an unaccompanied migrant, claiming to be 15 years old. A church charity housed him. He filed for asylum on the basis of persecution in Afghanistan, but a German tribunal rejected the application, finding his account not credible. Authorities ordered him deported.
That order was never carried out. After the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan, Germany paused deportations to the country, and Farhad N. stayed. He found work as a security guard and built a social media following, tens of thousands of followers on bodybuilding accounts. German broadsheet Die Welt noted that he appeared in court to be considerably older than his listed age of 25.
Beginning in 2024, Farhad N.'s behavior shifted. He took a renewed interest in his faith, gave up vices, and upbraided friends who did not attend mosque. Months later, he carried out the deadliest car-ramming attack in recent German history.
His defense lawyers argued he showed signs of schizophrenia and should be committed to a mental institution rather than imprisoned. The court rejected that argument. Judge Höhne pointed to Farhad N.'s precision behind the wheel, threading a gap of two inches between police trucks, as evidence of "his level of determination and attention," directly contradicting the defense's claim that he had accidentally entered the demonstration area because he was drowsy.
Attack struck hours before world leaders gathered at Munich Security Conference
The car-ramming occurred just hours before the Munich Security Conference opened, an annual gathering of global defense and foreign policy leaders. The timing guaranteed an international audience for the carnage.
The day after the attack, U.S. Vice President JD Vance addressed the conference and turned directly to the question of immigration and public safety in Europe. The New York Post reported that German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said at the time: "This perpetrator cannot hope for any leniency. He must be punished and he must leave the country."
Vance was more pointed. He challenged European leaders on the broader pattern:
"How many times must we suffer these appalling setbacks before we change course and take our shared civilisation in a new direction?"
Prosecutor Gabriele Tilmann, who handled the initial interrogation, said at the time that Farhad N. had "gave an explanation that I would summarise as religious motivation." That early admission tracked with what the court ultimately found months later at trial.
A system that failed at every checkpoint
The timeline reads like a catalog of missed exits. Farhad N.'s asylum claim was rejected. He was ordered deported. The deportation was shelved. He remained in Germany for years, working, building a public profile online, and, starting in 2024, radicalizing under the influence of anti-Western clerics whose content was freely available on the internet.
At no point did the system remove him. At no point did any agency intervene as his online activity shifted. And on February 13, 2025, a man who should not have been in Germany at all drove a car into a crowd of peaceful demonstrators and took the lives of a young mother and her toddler.
Just The News noted that the "particularly serious" guilt finding means Farhad N. faces a sentence with no realistic prospect of early release, a rare outcome under Germany's typically lenient sentencing framework, where most life sentences allow parole consideration at 15 years.
The life sentence is the right outcome. But a sentence handed down after two people are dead is accountability after the fact, not security. The question Vance posed in Munich still has no answer: how many times does this have to happen before the people in charge change course?

